Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 1501 - 1520 of 13,960
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2023, 8:22 am by Eric Goldman
Okularity * Copyright Plaintiffs Can’t Figure Out What Copyrights They Own, Court Says ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ * A 512(f) Case Leads to a Rare Damages Award (on a Default Judgment)–California Beach v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:25 pm by Eric E. Johnson
Minneapolis courthouse (on left) where Moore v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 6:21 am by Rosalind English
On 12 March 2014, the Supreme Court gave judgment in the case of R (BSkyB) v Commissioner of Police [2014] UKSC 17. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 7:13 am by Eric Goldman
Okularity * Copyright Plaintiffs Can’t Figure Out What Copyrights They Own, Court Says ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ * A 512(f) Case Leads to a Rare Damages Award (on a Default Judgment)–California Beach v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 12:00 am
  The figures were expressed to the nearest whole number. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 6:45 am by Keith Paul Bishop
  Yet, the failure to attend to either is likely to result in unpleasant consequences as one lawyer recently discovered in Winterton v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:32 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has given its ruling today in Case C-20/14 BGW Marketing- & Management-Service GmbH v Bodo Scholz, following a request by the German Bundespatentgericht for a preliminary ruling from the CJEU back in January 2014. [read post]