Search for: "Francies v. Francies" Results 1501 - 1520 of 1,819
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2019, 11:30 pm by Dáire McCormack-George
Skills Skills have been described as a ‘slippery concept’, resulting in mixed meanings in different disciplines (Francis Green, Skills and Skilled Work: An Economic and Social Analysis (OUP 2013 24). [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Finn, Thomas Finnegan, Rebecca Fishbein, Andrew Fisher, Steve Flaig, David Flanagan, Amy Fleming, Patrick Fleming, Charles Flohn, Mike Flores, Harry Florio, Whitney Fogt, Adam Foley, Elizabeth Foley, Michael Fontana, Susan Forbes, Linda Ford, David Foster, Jack Foster, Shane Foster, Brian Foust, Krista Frahm, John Allen Francis, Stan Francis, Yvonne Franke, Alex Fraser, Jay Fraze, Chuck French, Michael Fritsche, Peter Fritzinger, Steve Fry, Turnando Fuad, Jackie Fucci, Glenn… [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
– America-Israel Patent Law) Accelerated examination (Inventive Step) Suggestions for USPTO Director David Kappos (IP Watchdog) Mystery graph of the day (Patently-O) The crisis in the American patent system (CanadaPatentBlog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC debates stays pending re-examination; Injunctions when claims are of ‘suspect validity’: Fresenius USA, Inc v Baxter International, Inc (Patently-O) (IP Law Observer) (Gray on Claims) CAFC:… [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
On the same date there was a hearing in the case of PTW v WPT before Lewis J who gave an ex tempore judgment. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 12:46 am by Kevin LaCroix
  I should acknowledge at the outset Francis Pileggi’s February 19, 2012 post on his Delaware Corporate and Commerical Litigation blog (here), which first brought this decision to my attention. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am by Michael Douglas
Hannigan successfully sought a declaration that the contract had been wrongfully terminated; see Francis Gregory Hannigan v Inghams Enterprises Pty Limited [2019] NSWSC 321. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Many cases allow people who allege they had been sexually assaulted to be pseudonymous,[1] including when they are defendants being sued for libel and related torts.[2] Indeed, some allow pseudonymity for the alleged attacker as well as the alleged victim, if the two had been spouses or lovers in the past, because identifying one would also identify the other, at least to people who had known the couple.[3] But again, many other cases hold otherwise, some in highly prominent cases (for instance,… [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am by Frank Cranmer
Masterpiece Cakeshop again In Scardina v Masterpiece Cakeshop Inc (CO Ct App. [read post]