Search for: "GROUP v. STATE"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 37,519
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Law tends to regulate the rights and obligations of individuals, as distinct from groups such as families. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:39 pm
In support of the lawsuit, the ACLU referred the court to the 2012 case of Arizona v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 2:18 pm
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the 2022 case that overturned Roe v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 3:46 am
The court relied on Thompson v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:22 pm
"District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:48 pm
The Departments establishment of the IDR fee for post-February 20, 2025 disputes and their previous December 15, 2023 announcement of the full reopening of the IDR portal for all dispute categories are part of the Departments’ ongoing response to the August 3, 2023 Federal District court ruling in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 11:26 am
Reaction against the laws has been swift with Texas Democrats calling the bill “the most extreme anti-immigrant state bill in the United States,” and immigrant rights groups have sued to halt the law. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 11:05 am
Under the Supreme Court decision Allen v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
[Defendant was "walking along the highway holding up signs to passing motorists stating 'PHUCK,' '#THIN BLUE,' and 'Slow Down Police Ahead.'"] State v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm
His experience and expertise in the field will greatly contribute to the success and growth of our Funds practice group. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 1:35 pm
Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 6:08 am
From Linthicum v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am
The Mirror Group News have stated, “where historical wrongdoing took place, we apologise unreservedly, have taken full responsibility and paid appropriate compensation. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
” (It also didn’t help her case that this “serious incident” wasn’t properly reported.)Given that factual backdrop, the AD1 didn’t think the revocation was an inappropriate penalty and left the outcome undisturbed.Unfortunately, there's no revoking that.# # #DECISIONMatter of C.L. v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:41 pm
Today's decision by Magistrate Judge Jill Morris in McClanahan v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:15 pm
United States, Dred Scott v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 1:13 pm
OCT is the group behind the Juliana litigation, in addition to several cases brought against states in state courts. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Roberts's memo states the point clearly. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:38 pm
” Illinois insisted that there was no reason for the Supreme Court to intervene now, both because no other federal appeals court has addressed these kinds of gun restrictions since the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
