Search for: "Glass v. Glass"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 2,791
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
Last week's posts go like this:* Wii part ii - Partially valid patent remains unamendedDarren reports another decision of the amusing Wii-console patent case of Philips v Nintendo. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:09 pm
Jonathan Sumption QC (as he then was) displayed one of the helmets in a glass case at the front of the court (looking like a sculpture) whilst Alastair Wilson QC brought one of the helmets in a sports bag and handed it round the court - at least one of the Lords tried it on. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 5:33 am
And Quinta posted the Lawfare Podcast: "Goldsmith v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:30 am
Fortunately, I have good news and I won't leave you hangin'...People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 3:15 pm
February 2, 2007).* Officer had probable cause for a stop after pulling up next to defendant's car and seeing him drinking beer with a foam head from a glass. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 5:10 am
Similarly, in General Impact Glass & Window Corp., v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 11:05 am
In Ash v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 11:05 am
In Ash v. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 2:49 pm
On the fortieth anniversary of the Roe v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 11:38 am
Lowry, which considered whether a life-like jellyfish sculpture in clear glass could be protected. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 5:27 am
If someone wants to break in, they’ll simply break the glass. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 10:55 am
Circuit, Cook v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 11:05 am
In Ash v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 3:26 pm
(See Samsung Electronics v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 10:05 pm
Before the Apple v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 5:10 am
Similarly, in General Impact Glass & Window Corp., v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 4:30 am
So held Mr Justice Arnold this morning in Diageo v Intercontinental Brands [2010] EWHC 17 (Ch). [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 11:05 am
In Ash v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 3:26 pm
(See Samsung Electronics v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 5:40 am
However, if there is justification for the discrimination such as requiring steel workers to wear safety helmets and glasses whilst not requiring the same from the office workers at the factory, this will be seen as rational and permitted. [read post]
