Search for: "Goode v. State"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 44,658
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2022, 11:22 am
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 2:29 pm
The Respondents in the Pyett v. 14 Penn Plaza case, to be argued in the United States Supreme Court this fall, filed their brief this week. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 9:52 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 9:23 am
Barry Rostholder et al. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 7:16 am
I was in state court this morning. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:18 pm
(Originally published by The Atlantic on October 11, 2022) Later this term, the Supreme Court will decide Moore v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 4:34 am
SCOTUS has granted cert in Herring v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
NARA v. [read post]
11 Aug 2013, 11:11 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:26 am
A federal district court preliminarily enjoined Executive Order 13943 seeking to kick WeChat out of the United States. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 9:28 am
The judges’ conclusions on the key issues In order to make good an art 14 claim, a claimant has to establish that (a) the circumstances fall within the ambit of a substantive Convention right, (b) the claimant has a relevant status for the purposes of art 14, (c) they have been treated differently from others in a similar situation, by reason of their status; if so the burden is then on the state to demonstrate (d) whether the difference in treatment is objectively justified.… [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 7:34 am
Affirming a lower court’s dismissal of claims brought by a California legal technology company against its Japanese competitor over a $130 million investment round, the Ninth Circuit held that selling company equity shares does not qualify as selling goods or services under the Lanham Act (LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, PC v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 9:57 am
The panel stated that the complaint alleged facts sufficient to plead that Allstate abused its contractual discretion when it denied the proposed transfer to Mary’s husband Buddy, in breach of its implied duty to exercise its discretion in good faith. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 5:27 pm
Good. . [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 12:26 pm
Thereafter, the statute requires the President to impose a number of sanctions relating to (i) foreign assistance, (ii) arms sales, (iii) arms sales financing, (iv) denial of U.S. credit assistance (e.g., Export-Import Bank loans) and (v) a prohibition on exports of any controlled goods. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 3:36 pm
Co. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 8:11 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 6:32 am
The case is styled, Gilberto Rodriguez v. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
In Murdock v Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943), the U.S. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 10:12 pm
That's the good stuff. [read post]
