Search for: "Grant v. United States" Results 1501 - 1520 of 26,059
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2018, 6:58 am by Howard Bashman
United States, No. 17-9276, Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued a dissent, in which Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined, from the denial of certiorari. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:08 pm by Dwight Sullivan
A friend o’ CAAFlog called our attention to CAAF’s order on 4 February summarily granting and affirming in United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 8:35 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The United States Supreme Court has added to notable First Amendment speech cases to its docket in its September 29 Order granting certiorari. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This action is a byproduct of several state and federal actions commenced by plaintiff, a dual citizen of the United States and Brazil who resides in Brazil. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This action is a byproduct of several state and federal actions commenced by plaintiff, a dual citizen of the United States and Brazil who resides in Brazil. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 4:33 am by Grace Capel
The post Case Preview: Al-Jedda v Secretary of State for the Home Department appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:21 pm by WIMS
We conclude that the stay factors have been met in this case, and we therefore grant the motion for stay pending hearing by the merits panel. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 6:00 am
S-05-1379 RRB EFB (order filed 07/31/07), United States District Judge Ralph R. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 10:00 pm by Nietzer
On Septemeber 30, 2011, a United States District Court in New York granted Diamler AG, Mercedes-AMG GmbH, and Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC’s, motion for summary judgment in an action brought by Plaintiff to recover for injuries incurred in an accident that allegedly occurred because of multiple defects in the vehicle. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:03 am by Marty Lederman
Accordingly, the United States does not ask the district court to grant any relief to the plaintiff, nor to enjoin enforcement of section 3 of DOMA; it only argues that the district court should deny the motion to dismiss. [read post]