Search for: "In Interest of Ac" Results 1501 - 1520 of 2,067
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2019, 4:04 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd (Formerly known as Ace Bermuda Insurance Ltd, heard 12-13 November 2019. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:25 pm by NL
Mr J's return to this demand some 5 years later, with interest, triggered the present proceedings. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
” Balancing an individual’s privacy against other interests R v Director of Serious Fraud Office, ex parte Smith [1993] AC 1 provides an earlier case study in balancing an individual’s privacy, which was seen as inextricably connected to the concept of liberty, with other fundamental rights. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 5:05 am by David Hart QC
But the Court of Appeal touched on interesting general questions of retrospectivity and retroactivity. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 4:41 pm by Ilya Somin
I also refer interested readers to Randy Barnett’s excellent analyses here and here. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:08 pm by INFORRM
  In an interesting obiter observation, the Judge considered a way round this difficulty. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:23 am by J
Further, in Lane v Esdaile [1891] AC 210, it had been held that a requirement to obtain permission to appeal impliedly excluded an appeal against a refusal of permission. [read post]
2 May 2016, 3:09 am by Peter Mahler
” The defendants subsequently entered into an operating agreement naming themselves as sole members with a 50% interest each. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 6:01 am by floris_bex
Alter­native stories about what happened before, during and after the crime should then be compared ac­cording to their plausibility and the amount of evidence they explain. [read post]
12 May 2011, 3:47 pm by Gabe Johnson-Karp
  First, the case raises interesting issues of justiciability in the face of such sweeping harms, and of the proper role of the courts in our society. [read post]
2 May 2016, 3:09 am by Peter Mahler
” The defendants subsequently entered into an operating agreement naming themselves as sole members with a 50% interest each. [read post]
27 May 2010, 12:08 am by INFORRM
  This is an interesting proposal which is worthy of serious consideration. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:59 am by INFORRM
  A statement of the principle was set out in the case of Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417. [read post]
7 May 2013, 1:03 pm by Kevin Smith, J.D.
  This argument is supported in the brief from ACE and the other university groups. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 10:04 am by INFORRM
  The defence of fair comment was last considered by the House of Lords in Telnikoff v Matusevitch ([1992] 2 AC 343). [read post]
It is interesting that Lord Reed was careful to note that legitimate expectation was not an absolute principle of EU law and could justifiably be frustrated if it were in the public interest. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:43 am by David Hart QC
A time limitation was justified in the interests of certainty and it was reasonable to make the period relatively tight. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Canada’s constitution also has a treaty clause and, even more explicitly, its Section 109 stipulates that the crown’s constitutional interest is “subject to” the indigenous national interest unless and until a treaty has been contracted relinquishing it. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:39 am
  * Interest in unlikely sources - the Business Distribution Scheme for the Technical Boards of Appeal In this second episode, Merpel writes about the Enlarged Presidium of the Boards of Appeal’s Business Distribution Scheme for Technical Boards of Appeal, a yearly plan which essentially sets out which cases, according to their international classification, are to be handled by which Technical Board of Appeal. [read post]