Search for: "In Re CAL"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 5,797
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2012, 9:24 am
Cal. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 9:21 am
You're out your fees. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 10:17 am
If you’re impacted by the wildfires, what would you like to know? [read post]
11 May 2010, 11:14 am
That's going to play well.Think about that for the next 10 years and 8 months.Next time, make sure to read the huge signs in jail that say that your conversations can be monitored and recorded.They're not joking. [read post]
28 May 2014, 5:32 am
If you're admitted to LaVerne, you'll pay $75K for an ABA accredited degree. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:06 am
Which isn't the greatest news for the two guys who're going to be killed, or the one who'll spend 29 years to life in prison for shoplifting an $18 fanny pack from J.C. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 8:04 pm
Or maybe also because I know that, as a white guy, it wouldn't happen to me.But while stopped at a red light at an intersection in Hayward in September of 2003, Francisco Sanchez -- who had just paid his union dues and wasn't afilliated with a gang in any way -- was murdered in cold blood for no reason other than an idiot Norteno gang member concluded that Sanchez was a member of a rival Sureno gang because he was wearing a blue UNC baseball cap.The thought that you can be killed for… [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 11:43 pm
So those of you in Redondo Beach who're looking for some extra "compassion" pursuant to the Compassionate Use Act might want to look up Dr. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 6:35 pm
Because it's a very interesting case that provides firm support for the proposition (1) that attorneys can (and perhaps even must) present testimony from their client that they're pretty sure is false (as here, IMHO) so long as they don't "know" it's perjurious, and (2) that putting the client up on the stand without direct examination, and letting him give his perjurious testimony narratively, is a pretty good solution to the problem.Both propositions are… [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 9:07 am
Cal.; Aug 17, 2012) This is a putative class action under the Video Privacy Protection Act alleging Netflix violated the VPPA (and Cal. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 3:46 am
Cal.) [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
Superior Court (Gonzalez), 40 Cal.4th 1069 (2007). [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 11:06 am
But we properly give an instruction on that at trial, and adding res ipsa on top of that doesn't seem like what res ipsa's designed to do. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 2:06 am
Cal. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 6:00 am
Superior Court (Gonzalez), ___ Cal.4th ___ (Apr. 16, 2007) is a densely-packed decision. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 11:59 am
You're going to kill the child you're trying to save.Extremely unfortunate. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 8:11 am
You’re just sending a voice message. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Cal. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:28 am
Not when you're trying to sue Google. [read post]
22 May 2015, 2:02 pm
Right, we're not going to grant injunctive relief. [read post]
