Search for: "In re: Davis v."
Results 1501 - 1520
of 1,772
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
(in support of petitioner) Docket: 08-1443 Title: In re Troy Davis Issue: After the capital defendant has exhausted relief from any other court and seven of nine State witnesses have recanted their trial testimony, should the Court grant “original” habeas and transfer the case to a federal District Court to hold an evidentiary hearing? [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 12:46 am
Davis v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:50 am
By Meaghan KlemAddressing an issue of first impression in Indiana law, the Indiana Court of Appeals held Thursday that “circumstances of animal cruelty may create exigent circumstances to permit a warrantless search of the curtilage,” and that the results of the curtilage search may provide probable cause for a further search of the property.In Davis v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 1:40 am
California Daily JournalRESULT DATE: April 28, 2009Arthur Lewis, Jesse Lewis, Arthur Lewis III, a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Linda Benton, Nathaniel Lewis, a minor, by and through his Guardian ad Litem, Camille Davis v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 9:17 am
” Unfortunately, this is true not only in Alabama, as has become evident in the case of Troy Davis, who may soon face his fourth execution date in two years, despite the fact that the case against him was build predominantly on the testimony of nine witnesses, seven of whom have recanted their statements (and have alleged that they were coerced by authorities) since the time of Troy’s conviction. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 6:51 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 11:22 am
Bank v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 7:56 am
The case, Bilski v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 12:00 pm
That case was Davis v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 3:27 am
" They say "The State of Georgia v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 3:47 am
If this law thing isn’t going your way, you might want to think about working on an assembly line, like the plaintiff in Davis v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 7:39 am
Michelle Davis won in State v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
Ø Title VII v. the First AmendmentAvila v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:53 am
Davis writes: "The leading case in New York on the interpretation of attorney retainer agreements is Shaw v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 17, 2009 US v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 12:49 am
Specifically, in Davis v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 12:58 pm
Ergotron case Judge Davis just issued his posttrial rulings on this morning. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 9:15 am
Mass Engineered Design, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 2:41 pm
(See Alicia T. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 9:41 am
The Dutch Court clearly distinguished its judgment from the UK decision and the distinction was justified by new experimental evidence as well as expert evidence provided by Tiefenbacher, In the UK case, Kitchin J heavily relied on the interpretation by Prof Davies, Head of Chemistry at Oxford University, of certain organic chemistry rules called the "Baldwin Rules", which were created by Davies' predecessor at Oxford, Prof. [read post]
