Search for: "Jess Bravin"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 1,908
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2010, 7:45 am
Jess Bravin of WSJ Law Blog delves into the effect of Citizens United on state campaign laws, focusing on corporate electioneering in Montana. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 8:24 pm
" Jess Bravin will have this article Tuesday in The Wall Street Journal. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 11:42 am
Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal has a news update headlined "High Court Hears Free-Speech Case. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:21 am
On her Crossroads blog for CBS News, Jan Crawford reported that Justice Kagan “came off like a seasoned, savvy pro,” while at the WSJ Law Blog Jess Bravin concluded that Justice Kagan, along with Justice Scalia and Ginsburg, “seemed to dominate the questioning. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:16 am
WSJ Law Blog’s Jess Bravin and NPR’s David Gura have coverage. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:50 am
” Meanwhile, Jess Bravin of the Wall Street Journal looks toward the release of the authorized biography of the late Justice William Brennan. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 8:58 pm
Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal is reporting: In Monday's newspaper, he will have articles headlined "Free Speech Tested Anew in Digital Age; Supreme Court Will Consider First Amendment Rights as They Apply to Two Cases Involving the Internet and Videogames" and "Justice Brennan's Legacy Explored in New Book. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 8:18 am
Jess Bravin of the Wall Street Journal provides excerpts of his interview with Justice Breyer last week. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 6:46 am
Meanwhile, in the Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports on a recent conversation with Justice Breyer at his chambers in Boston, in which the Justice addressed popular misperceptions of the Court, while the Associated Press (via the San Jose Mercury News) briefly covers his recent appearance in Los Angeles. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 6:45 am
"Breyer Makes Case for Justices' Adherence to Constitution": Jess Bravin has this article today in The Wall Street Journal. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 11:13 am
Amar of the UC Davis School of Law, Jesse H. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:40 am
" Today in The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports that "Gitmo Trial Revisits Days Following Capture. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:13 am
Jurist’s Ann Riley reports on recent news in Khadr’s trial, as do the Wall Street Journal’s Jess Bravin and the AP’s Mike Melia (via the Los Angeles Times). [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 8:33 am
Jess Bravin of the Wall Street Journal compares the respective paths that Kagan and Chief Justice Roberts followed to reach the Court, and the WSJ Law Blog’s Ashby Jones follows up on Bravin’s commentary. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 6:44 am
" And Jess Bravin has an article headlined "Kagan and Roberts: Similar Paths, Poles Apart. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 5:57 am
Jess Bravin, writing in Friday's WSJ, takes a look at the career trajectories of Elena Kagan and Chief Justice John Roberts, predicting that the two "could wrestle over competing visions of American law for decades to come. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:55 am
Both Jess Bravin of the WSJ Law Blog and Lyle Denniston of this blog have coverage of Ginsburg’s speech; they note that Ginsburg seemed to approve of Kagan’s suggestion that a foreign decision “could be informative in much the same way as . . . a law review article,” and she seemed critical of Republican senators’ condemnations of the use of foreign law in American courts. [read post]
31 Jul 2010, 7:30 am
(hat tip: Jess Bravin) (The role of foreign context in the school desegregation litigation is, incidentally, a key aspect of the scholarship of IntLawGrrl guest/alumna Mary Dudziak.)An interesting added note in Ginsburg's full speech, available here: her reference to judges' consultation of "any number of legal blogs. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:00 pm
At WSJ.com's "Law Blog," Jess Bravin has a post titled "Looking Global: Ginsburg Speaks Out on Kagan, Comparative Law Issue. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:59 am
The WSJ Law Blog’s Jess Bravin discusses statistics that “[identify] which [J]ustices speak first, longest and most often” at oral argument. [read post]
