Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 7,889
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2017, 10:00 pm
1. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 11:48 am
The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) and related regulations establish their own rules for structured settlement annuities including laws for structured settlement recipients to qualify for an IRC 104(a)(1) or (2) exclusion. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 6:04 am
John McLane. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
During my recent visit to Columbia Law School, Professor John Coffee shared with me a draft of a short article that later appeared in the New York Law Journal.[1] Coffee’s article assessed the prospects in the U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 2:02 pm
Justice John Paul Stevens 1. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 3:11 pm
June 2, 2011). [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 10:57 pm
[LA Weekly via Alkon, earlier on Chicago] “Massachusetts curbs lifetime alimony payments” [NY Times; Jennifer Braceras, Boston Herald] Many state child support formulas overstate cost of child raising [Bader] In the mail: new John Fonte book on transnational legal structures, “Sovereignty or Submission” [Encounter Books] Tags: child support, divorce, foie gras, Massachusetts, regulation and its reform, same-sex marriage Related posts By reader acclaim:… [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 1:47 pm
On 16 September 2010, the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held in the case of John Doe v Silsbee Independent School District, that the cheerleader was speaking for the school, not herself, and had no right to remain silent when called on to shout the athlete’s name. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 9:03 am
On November 3, 2016 from 12 to 1 p.m. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:05 am
(Update 3. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 4:41 am
” His broader point is that my logic does not fully justify my claim of legality: Ben bases this assertion on a series of interrelated arguments, none of which, in my view, actually get him all the way to his conclusion: (1) Things aren’t not as bad as the bad-old days of the 1970s; (2) “nobody can argue that it is a lawless or crazy interpretation of the statute; in fact, it’s on its face quite plausible”; (3) the FISA Court… [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 10:05 pm
The Times does not reveal its source for the documents here. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 5:10 pm
Does 1-500 - Brief of Amicus Curiae... [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 11:17 am
(John W. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:48 am
To win any civil case, one must show that (1) someone did something legally wrong, (2) it cause harm, and (3) the dollar value of the harm. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
From the States and Municipalities: Florida: Where Does She Live? [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 7:08 am
Given the implications of proposed Rule 13f-2, the Commission also voted to reopen the comment period for 1934 Act Rule 10c-1. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 9:26 am
Here is the breakdown: Case JR JPS AS AK DS CT RBG SB SA COUNSEL TOTAL Washington 1 2 3 Tom F. 0 Gall 1 2 3 Kimbrough 1 1 2 Torres 3 1 4 Santos 1 1 Watson 1 1 1 3 Stoneridge 1 1 Medellin 1 1 1 3 … [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:33 am
Examples Example 1 – An S-signature for a pro se applicant Respectfully submitted, /John Smith/ John Smith Example 2 – An S-signature for registered practitioner Respectfully submitted, By: /John Smith/ John Smith Reg. [read post]
