Search for: "Label v Label"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 13,300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2011, 8:24 am
The Coca-Cola Company v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 5:48 am
In Warner v. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 3:35 am
In Capitol v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:22 pm
Foster v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:22 pm
Foster v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 5:22 pm
Foster v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
[Courts are all over the map about jurisdiction, but the label isn't as important as the substance.] [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 5:00 am
” O’Neil v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 9:47 am
S.A.S. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 11:17 am
” Chappuis v. [read post]
23 May 2008, 11:30 am
The name of the case is UMG v. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 6:19 am
Trubridge, who had once been in a successful 70s pop band, said his band got just 3% of the 'recorded music' share of any stream - with his label (who were originally Magnet, now owned by Warners) taking the rest - 97%. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 3:25 am
The widely reported case of SONY v. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 4:22 am
There is a new contested case in South Carolina, SONY v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:00 am
I mentioned Christoff v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 12:20 pm
The defendant in U.S. v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 6:10 am
Doe 1, and Capitol v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:00 am
Not that PLIVA v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 10:30 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
