Search for: "Land v. United States"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 6,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2012, 11:47 am
This argument failed, the Court stated, because it conflated financial self-dealing with usurpation of a corporate opportunity, with only the latter having been plead and argued on appeal.The Court then examined the church's claim under the standard set forth in Dixon v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 12:30 pm
Cayetano and Hawai'i v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 4:00 pm
Department of Agriculture has recognized that heirs’ property has been the leading cause of Black involuntary land loss in the United States. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 2:45 pm
When the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled in the case of Kelo v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 12:52 pm
United States, No. 11-597 (cert. granted Apr. 2, 2012). [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:51 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:52 am
(09-1298) and Boeing Co. v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 10:31 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Owensby & Kritikos, Incorporated, et al. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 9:00 am
Deschutes River All. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 6:59 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 2:30 am
For his concluding masterstroke, Marshall turned to Article VI, noting that the Constitution is “the supreme Law of the Land” and that all “judicial Officers” of the United States are bound by it. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 3:16 am
For his concluding masterstroke, Marshall turned to Article VI, noting that the Constitution is “the supreme Law of the Land” and that all “judicial Officers” of the United States are bound by it. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:24 am
(Indian Child Welfare Act - Notice)Brown v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:24 am
(Indian Child Welfare Act - Notice)Brown v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 3:05 pm
Tying a tribal officer's hands: Tribal law enforcement authority under United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 6:52 am
Hebert Law Center, Louisiana State University, 2012. [1] See TDX Energy, LLC v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 9:02 pm
The idea was that the federal government has no business impressing a land use cookie cutter across the country.Starting with Village of Euclid v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 9:14 am
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
United States Department of Transportation (Public Transportation Project – Sacred Places)Union Pacific Railroad Company v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 12:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
