Search for: "Large v. Superior Court" Results 1501 - 1520 of 2,226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2023, 11:44 am by Giles Peaker
However, as the Renters (Reform) Bill so far effectively reverses the Supreme Court decision in Rakusen v Jepsen (our note) as to liability of superior landlords, the passage of the Bill may make this position more complicated…           The post Upper Tribunal on ‘person managing’ and ‘person in control’ of HMO for an RRO appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
5 May 2009, 6:09 am
One positive side-effect of the change will be that the Upper Tribunal is a superior court of record and so its decisions ought to constitute binding authority on RPT’s and LVT’s. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:29 am by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed at length here, both the Ninth Circuit and the California state courts upheld the finding of continuing state court jurisdiction for ’33 Act claims in connection with the Luther v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
A trial court may inquire into the anticipated length of an examination (R. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm by Ben Berwick, Justin Florence
  As the Illinois Supreme Court explained in an 1872 case, Walsh v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
Whether the Legislature has the power to draft around the errors found by the Court will depend in large part on whether the Court holds that Proposition 22 implicitly prevents the legislative dissolution of RDAs. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 9:39 am
Whether the Legislature has the power to draft around the errors found by the Court will depend in large part on whether the Court holds that Proposition 22 implicitly prevents the legislative dissolution of RDAs. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:02 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
As the Pennsylvania Superior Court said years ago, “The Crimes Code nowhere defines this duty,” Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 9:40 am by Larry Downes
  Offering superior service, an ever-growing menu of new options and features, and competitive pricing also works just fine. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 8:00 pm by Howard Knopf
It must be remembered at all times that, according to no less than the Supreme Court of Canada: Fair dealing is a user’s rightIt must be given a large and liberal interpretationIt is always available See the Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) decision in CCH Canadian Ltd. v. [read post]