Search for: "Leviness v. State" Results 1501 - 1520 of 2,343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2021, 12:23 pm by Joshua Braver
§ 2383 provides: Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:13 pm
Ct. 1520 (2008), and the challenge to Indiana's voter ID law in Crawford v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 11:30 am
The Sixteenth Amendment (1913) gave Congress the power to levy an income tax, which had been previously outlawed by the Supreme Court in Pollock v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 3:17 am
However, a recent decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, in CIT v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:46 am
"He disagreed with the appeals court ruling last March in the Parker v. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Justice Dollinger also relied heavily on the 2008 opinion of the Second Department in Levy v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 4:18 pm by Ron Coleman
§ 1054, ending with the commonplace that “[c]ertification marks are generally treated the same as trademarks for purposes of trademark law,” quoting Levy v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 5:17 pm by Peter Mahler
The Company The above-described scenario played out in a lawsuit captioned Magarik v Kraus USA, Inc. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 8:00 am
  Global - Patents Open Innovation Network unveils Linux Defenders to protect open source from patent suits by establishing prior art and participating in patent peer review (Ars Technica) (Securing Innovation)   Bulgaria RARBG, ArenaBG and other BitTorrent trackers forced to shut down or relocate following police action (TorrentFreak) (TorrentFreak)   Cameroon Third-level domain names come to Cameroon (Afro-IP)     Canada   Copyright Board… [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm by Jim Sedor
She has said she would not vote to confirm a nominee who was hostile to Roe v. [read post]