Search for: "London v. State"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 4,158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
That conclusion, which, in our judgment, follows from the plain meaning of subsection (4), is supported by the authorities: see in particular Wilson v First County Trust Ltd [2001] QB 407, Watchtower Investments Ltd v Payne [2001] EWCA Civ 1159, [2001] GCCR 3055 and Wilson v Robertsons (London) Ltd [2005] EWHC 1425 (Ch), [2006] 1 WLR 1248. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm
That conclusion, which, in our judgment, follows from the plain meaning of subsection (4), is supported by the authorities: see in particular Wilson v First County Trust Ltd [2001] QB 407, Watchtower Investments Ltd v Payne [2001] EWCA Civ 1159, [2001] GCCR 3055 and Wilson v Robertsons (London) Ltd [2005] EWHC 1425 (Ch), [2006] 1 WLR 1248. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:36 am
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Being unsure whether allowing exploitation of works without prior permission from the relevant rightholder is permitted, the French Council of State has just sought guidance from the CJEU. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 5:38 am
Those powers state that the Secretary of State may provide accommodation where an asylum application has been refused, but there is an obstacle to the applicant returning to their country of origin. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:19 pm
The facts of Richard v BBC [2018] EWHC 1837 (Ch) help demonstrate this. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
Professor Seck has recently been considering ramifications of Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum 569 U. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:12 am
De Matos (Brunel University London)The Shadows of Modern State Law: a Visual Genealogy of Dark KnightsSophie Doherty (Dublin City University)What does Justice in the Aftermath of Sexual Violence look like? [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 11:30 am
”In the London Review of Books, Andrew Bacevich covers The General v. the President: MacArthur and Truman at the Brink of Nuclear War by H.W. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 1:51 am
FLAG -- meets next week on the evening of 18 March, in the House of Lords, London. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 6:35 am
Haier I and Sisvel v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:20 am
Do you think London cabs have such a distinctive character enough to hold a trade mark? [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:00 am
Merton London Borough Council, [1978] A.C. 728. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 11:08 am
The Court noted that AXA would only have the duty to defend the City if the Statements of Claim in the underlying actions alleged a state of facts that, properly construed, would support an action that could potentially fall within coverage: Non-Marine Underwriters, Lloyds of London v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:52 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 8:56 pm
City of New London (2005). [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 4:42 pm
District Judge Alfred V. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:11 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v B2, heard 18 November 2014. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 10:06 am
As a special feature of our blog—guest postings by experts, clients, and other professionals—please enjoy this blog entry from Jeremy Morton, Partner at Harbottle & Lewis LLP, London, UK. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:00 am
London Borough of Southwark & Anor v Transport for London, heard 24-25 Oct 2018. [read post]
