Search for: "London v. State"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 3,590
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2011, 1:28 pm
Here is the abstract: Kelo v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:12 am
The Guardian published results of a study of Twitter usage during the London riots recently. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 2:31 pm
The Court of Justice has handed down its eagerly awaited judgment in Case C-438/05 International Transport Workers' Federation & The Finnish Seamen's Union v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 1:57 pm
German princes wrote to King George V, offering to substitute themselves for the kaiser. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
Wilson v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
But the approach taken by the Court of Appeal in R v Wandsworth London Borough Council, Ex p O [2000] 1 WLR 2539 remained the law and had not been changed by the House of Lords in M v Slough. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm
But the approach taken by the Court of Appeal in R v Wandsworth London Borough Council, Ex p O [2000] 1 WLR 2539 remained the law and had not been changed by the House of Lords in M v Slough. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:36 pm
What she cannot do, however, is use the power of the State to punish or suppress disfavored expression. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
United States The Cyberlaw Clinic reports that it has filed an amicus curiae brief (.pdf) in the United States Supreme Court in Oracle v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 5:02 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:56 am
As mentioned above, on Thursday 20 June 2024 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) handed down a unanimous judgment in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Styen J handed down judgement in the case of Prospect v Evans [2024] EWHC 1533 (KB). [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014] EWHC 3354… [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 1:09 pm
Continuing the theme of balancing copyright and other fundamental rights, from this Kat’s previous book review, she now turns to Emily Hudson’s Drafting Copyright Exceptions: From the Law in Books to the Law in Action, which was also nominated in the IPKat book of year awards for best copyright book.Law in books v law in action Hudson, Reader at King’s College London, introduces her book by stating that we need a new paradigm through which to view… [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 11:03 am
| Good news and bad news for bio-pharmaceutical patenting in the United States | HP? [read post]
4 May 2022, 10:01 pm
An Optis v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 8:57 am
Judge Koh, who was made globally famous when she presided in the Apple v Samsung dispute, stated that to do so would essentially be going overboard. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:30 pm
Around the Colloquia: Malick Ghachem, Maine Law, presented "The Legal History of Prisoner Voting: A View from the Northeastern United States” to his faculty’s workshop. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
”, London School of Economics. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:01 pm
UK decision actually states in full [read post]
