Search for: "Long v. United States"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 20,220
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2012, 1:00 pm
What strikes me as a bit more interesting is the playing out, in another legal context, of the running argument between Scalia and Breyer over bureaucratic sentencing — an argument that has done much to animate the long line of cases following Apprendi v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:20 am
United States Steel Corp., No. 12–417. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:42 am
United States, I posted some snarky, post-legal realism, observations about why this was less than good news. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 12:00 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari review of United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:29 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit agreed. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:37 am
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:48 am
But the case brings the most direct legal challenge in the United States to the clout that Apple has built up through its App Store. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 7:20 am
But many have noted that since Campbell, transformative use has caused fair use to grow overly expansive and unbalanced.4See, e.g., Jane Ginsburg, Fair Use in the United States: Transformed, Deformed, Reformed? [read post]
18 May 2012, 10:30 am
Supreme Court’s highly unpopular and wobbly reasoned opinion in Citizens United v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 11:17 am
Earlier today the United States Supreme Court released a unanimous opinion in Groff v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 12:58 pm
United States Baseball Federation, Cal. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 8:42 am
United States v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 4:46 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:54 pm
The court did not specify for how long the visas would be considered valid. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 10:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 7:12 pm
S. ____ (2023) 1 ALITO, J., dissenting SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 22A901 _________________ DANCO LABORATORIES, LLC v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 2:33 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm
As long as petitioners can satisfy the criteria set out by Congress, they can restrict or interfere with trade. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 10:35 am
United States, No. 11-597 (Aug. 27, 2012) [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 5:18 pm
In the case of Ruffing v. [read post]
