Search for: "MARTINEZ V. STATE" Results 1501 - 1520 of 1,669
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
  In the middle are a small group of academic theorists who see value and resilience in the state but understand that the ideological pretensions of the Westphalian system have become unrealistic in a world now ordered through governance frameworks of a number of actors only some of which are states. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 2:18 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
Feed Mills, Inc., 268 So. 2d 363, 366 (Fla. 1972), that provides “full medical care and wage-loss payments for total or partial disability regardless of fault,” Martinez v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 1:45 pm by Linda Odermott
In an article titled, Legal deserts threaten justice for all in rural America, ABA President, Judy-Perry Martinez stated,  Nearly every state in the nation has large stretches of rural areas and counties with few lawyers in them – or no lawyers at all. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:56 am
 Thus, in the 1991 case of Rust v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:21 pm
Bataz Martinez, No. 04-15405, 2009 WL 707772 (11th Cir., Mar. 19, 2009), a drug prosecution, “because [the defendant] failed to demonstrate that he was less culpable than most of the other participants in the offense,” id. at *2. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:09 am by Erin Miller
Florida and United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 10:03 am
Martinez     Northern District of Ohio at Toledo 08a0736n.06  Russell v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Torres, No. 072331 Sentence of 188 to 235 months for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in counting both the state drug offense and the state gun offense as contributing to defendant's status as a career offender; 2) the district court was correct in finding the state gun conviction to be a "crime of violence" for career-offender purposes; and 3) district court was compelled to… [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 10:34 am
The trial court's decision dismissing Thompson's complaint for failure to state a claim is, therefore, affirmed.In Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. [read post]