Search for: "MATTER OF A W A V"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 8,370
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2021, 1:11 am
"Preliminary" means that the ECJ answers the question, and then the national court resumes its proceedings and enters its judgment, as opposed to a traditional appeal from a final judgment.When I saw the question referred to the ECJ, I already noticed that it was very well written, and I wish the Dusseldorf Regional Court had done a similarly good job in that Nokia v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm
Burden people w/disabilities; insane delusion doctrine is applied to invalidate people w/marginalized beliefs (such as a donation to the National Women’s Party rejected for neurotic degree of feminism). [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am
My point is not a matter solely of removal. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:43 am
Atari v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 5:57 am
W. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm
How "reduced" is a matter about which reasonable minds can, have, and do disagree. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 12:48 pm
Fund v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 1:09 pm
Related Cases: Uniloc v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
The second is T W Logistics Ltd v Essex County Council & Anor. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm
Research and Resources Privacy Rights and Remedies, Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1991, 41 Case W. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 1:01 pm
" In each of these situations, as a general matter, the determinations of boards of election could be appealed to the courts. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 7:12 am
W. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 3:07 am
“To succeed on a motion to dismiss based upon documentary evidence pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1), the documentary evidence must utterly refute the plaintiff’s factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law” (Gould v Decolator, 121 AD3d 845, 847; see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88). [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 7:59 am
” Henry Schein, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 7:59 am
” Henry Schein, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 7:45 am
” Jones v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
W. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
In Kiobel v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
This year that didn’t matter, because the audit agreed with the official outcome. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 1:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern Ireland), heard 2 December 2019… [read post]
