Search for: "MATTER OF B T B"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 20,066
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2014, 10:39 am
The defendant moved to dismiss or in the alternative to transfer the matter to Cook County. [read post]
22 May 2013, 4:05 am
I don’t know whether those costs to the President and White House are worth the benefits Keller describes – we will see. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 4:05 pm
Gabriel Schoenfeld points out in the Weekly Standard that the administration’s nominee to be general counsel of the Army, Solomon B. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 11:07 am
In B. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 7:47 am
Whatever that was, it certainly wasn’t ‘smart power,’ and this outcome was predictable.” [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
It does not matter in what form the subject of the appeal is identified, as long as it is clear. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 10:25 am
The Kelloggcourt looks at size, prominence, font; we can’t say there’s some recent trend on disclaimers b/c there’s no recent trend of using unfair competition as a distinct body of law at all. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 9:06 am
Idea of clear gap b/t author and reader also disappears: the “prosumer. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:16 am
§ 14-34.1(b). [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 10:24 am
The company contends that Chevedden failed to meet the proof-of-ownership requirements in SEC Rule 14a-8(b). [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 6:54 am
By: Scott B. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 6:00 pm
For obvious reasons, there aren't too many court opinions ruling on such a case (most plaintiff's lawyers would reject such cases as unwinnable, regardless of the law, given juror sentiment like B. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
Insitutionalists fought back: politicsled to sustained shift of bargaining power b/t labor and capital, b/t financial sector and others; free movements of goods/capital but not people across borders created new methods of offshoring, outsourcing, etc. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
As a matter of fact, no “fresh case” should be brought (B. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 6:21 am
Certainly the partner isn't being prosecuted for the B&E; nor is Bravo, for that matter. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
"[T]he possibility that a judgment rendered without the omitted party could have an adverse practical effect on that party is enough to indicate joinder" (Matter of Nemeth v K-Tooling, 163 AD3d 1143, 1144 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of 27th St. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
"[T]he possibility that a judgment rendered without the omitted party could have an adverse practical effect on that party is enough to indicate joinder" (Matter of Nemeth v K-Tooling, 163 AD3d 1143, 1144 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of 27th St. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
"[T]he possibility that a judgment rendered without the omitted party could have an adverse practical effect on that party is enough to indicate joinder" (Matter of Nemeth v K-Tooling, 163 AD3d 1143, 1144 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of 27th St. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
"[T]he possibility that a judgment rendered without the omitted party could have an adverse practical effect on that party is enough to indicate joinder" (Matter of Nemeth v K-Tooling, 163 AD3d 1143, 1144 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of 27th St. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 9:23 am
P. 26(b)(1) (emphasis added). [read post]
