Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 5,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2015, 5:44 am
” Considering the six non-exhaustive factors set forth in Section 43(c)(2)(B)(i)-(vi), the Board found that opposer would likely suffer an impairment of the distinctiveness of its mark, even though opposer had no current involvement in real estate, since many luxury brands have licensed use of their marks in connection with hotels, and other have found opportunities in related areas, like interior design services and bathroom fixtures.Boi Na Braza, LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:30 am
C. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 3:19 am
" In re Maria C. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 10:26 am
So far, so good. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Rev. 129 (2022)).Zainuddin Zainuddin & Rosmini Rosmini, Distribution of Zakat for Communities Affected by COVID-19 in the Perspective of Socio-Economic Justice, (November 30, 2022).Nancy C. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 1:37 pm
Mark A. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:45 pm
Moore, India–Solar Cells: Trade Rules, Climate Policy, and Sustainable Development Goals Petros C. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
Good luck for 2010 and the many years beyond. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 3:31 am
Hopkins' Law of Unfair Trade including Trade-Marks, Trade Secrets, and Good-Will (1900), and more. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 8:23 am
Hopkins' Law of Unfair Trade including Trade-Marks, Trade Secrets, and Good-Will (1900), and more. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 10:50 am
The ability to find and detain goods to be imported has improved. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:02 am
Haydel also argued that its marks weren’t descriptive, because the term MARDI GRAS BEAD DOG and the bead dog design didn’t describe jewelry, clothing, or baked goods. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:30 pm
I always enjoy a good series, and the one the group at Trademarkology started today looks to be a good one. [read post]
Registration “Before Notice” and Offering Bona Fide Goods or Services Good Defense to UDRP Complaint
18 Oct 2012, 12:01 pm
” Paragraph 4(c)(i) of the Policy. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 5:27 pm
District Judge James C. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 11:58 am
Section 2 of the Lanham Act empowers the PTO to deny or cancel a mark’s registration, and thus control what appears on the Principal Register, on a number of grounds, including [besides the prohibition on disparaging marks] any mark that: (b) Consists of or comprises the flag or coat of arms or other insignia of the United States, or of any State or municipality, or of any foreign nation, or any simulation thereof; (c) Consists of or comprises a name,… [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 12:13 am
As a reminder, the following italicized questions come from Jane C. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 10:05 am
Functionality; more issues on boundaries b/c of Star Athletica and rise of digital goods. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 11:51 am
(ii) the similarity of the marks and whether the defendant’s mark draws a clear distinction as a competing brand.... [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 8:15 am
This has become apparent in case C‑121/19P decided on 16 September 2020 where, in a nutshell, the CJEU had to decide whether “electricity” was a “fuel” back in 2003. [read post]
