Search for: "Maryland v. United States" Results 1501 - 1520 of 2,975
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2009, 12:32 pm
b.Did the Sixth Circuit exceed its authority under AEDPA when it applied United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 9:33 am
Comity did not require a Maryland court to apply Pakistani law upon the divorce of Pakistanis who were long-term United States residents when Pakistani law provided that the wife could not share in the husband's admittedly valuable pension. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 9:33 am
Comity did not require a Maryland court to apply Pakistani law upon the divorce of Pakistanis who were long-term United States residents when Pakistani law provided that the wife could not share in the husband's admittedly valuable pension. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 2:34 pm by John Elwood
But the court did not reach the question, resolving the case based on the presumption against extraterritoriality because “all the relevant conduct” giving rise to Kiobel’s claims took place outside the United States. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 6:22 am by Adam Chandler
” Also, at PrawfsBlawg, Bill Araiza compares three recent Supreme Court cases—Citizens United, United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 9:00 pm
 The United States Supreme Court left it up to the Maryland courts  to decide whether the intervening change in Maryland's sit-in/trespassing laws would dictate a different result. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 5:09 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As has been well-documented, the United States in the middle of an “epidemic” involving the abuse of prescription and non-prescription opioids. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:09 am by Eugene Volokh
Is it time to use Article V to amend Article V? [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 9:12 am by Scott Bomboy
United States, the question was about the ability of the police to use probable cause to search a motor vehicle when its driver appears to have committed a non-moving parking infraction. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:24 am by Anna Christensen
  And a second piece at Balkinization today argues that instead of overturning the Slaughter-House Cases, as the petitioners suggested, the Court should overturn its 1875 decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 4:04 pm by John W. Arden
The State of Maryland passed a law in 2009 clarifying that resale price maintenance (RPM) remains per se illegal in the state. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
United States 14-456Issue: Whether, when a court of appeals issues a general remand for resentencing, the district court may conduct resentencing de novo. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 9:00 pm
Moreover, if prosecutors are going to take the time to try to cage so many people (to the tune of around 2 million present inmates in the United States), it is essential that courts give full attention and consideration to inmate complaints of ill-treatment as serious as that stated by Mr. [read post]