Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 6,181
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2019, 3:10 pm
Heather’s Legal Summaries: R v Trinchi, 2019 ONCA 356 R v Trinchi is the most recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in a string of cases related to the offence of voyeurism under s. 162(1) of the Criminal Code (see our previous post on the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in R v Jarvis). [read post]
2 May 2019, 9:54 am
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, 868 F.3d 87 (2d Cir. 2017) and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:51 am
Claimants claim that the basis of their claims against the parent companies is no different from that of SPDC [Shell's Nigerian operating company]" (Opinion ¶ 4.8). [read post]
1 May 2019, 4:00 am
Platnick v. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 4:35 pm
A relatively recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in Williams v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 11:10 am
See Toronto Real Estate Board v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:27 pm
” Wisconsin v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
They are also likely doing it because as the Supreme Court of Canada stated in Pintea v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:48 am
¶ 24. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 8:22 am
Fifth, it is not for the court to “search around” for a justification that the policy maker has not advanced: R (Elias) v Secretary of State for Defence at (131). [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:22 am
Equally, the representations did not amount to a fresh human rights claim within the meaning of the Immigration Rules, para 353. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 5:29 pm
Post the TRF decision [TRF Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 9:35 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v MM (Scotland) was heard on 9th April. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 10:00 am
Guide: Civil Procedure Before Trial (TRG 2018) ¶9:324.1 citing R&B Auto Center, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 7:29 am
In this respect, Lord Briggs commended the summary by Sales LJ in AAA v Unilever plc [2018] EWCA Civ 1532, para 36 (another challenge to jurisdiction on similar issues) that “A parent company will only be found to be subject to a duty of care in relation to an activity of its subsidiary if ordinary, general principles of the law of tort regarding the imposition of a duty of care on the part of the parent in favour of a claim are satisfied in the particular case”. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 7:00 am
In Liu v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 5:49 am
United States Polo Association v. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 1:59 pm
Bell Canada, 2010 FCA 139 at paras. 20 and 26, a case which I argued. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 2:03 pm
[v] Ibid at para 185. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 10:56 am
Under the overall theme “Time to act: Governments as catalysts for business respect for human rights”, the 2019 Forum will focus on the need for more coherent and concrete action by States, including effective regulation, improved policy coherence, and leading by example in the various roles States have as economic actors. [read post]
