Search for: "People v Edwards" Results 1501 - 1520 of 1,774
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2013, 8:55 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Here’s the Blog of Legal Times’ report on oral arguments in Bahlul v. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:36 pm
 The IPKat would like to thank a number of donors for their support, of whom only one so far -- Edward Elgar Publishing -- has agreed to be named as a supporter (click here to check out publications in the fields of intellectual property, innovation, economics and all sorts of other things). [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 4:05 pm
More information on Professor Li's book can be found on the Edward Elgar website here. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 11:53 am
Our analysis  elicited rapid and vociferous criticism from many people, including Edward Whelan in the pages of the L.A. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 10:43 am by Ritika Singh
Linda Greenhouse of the New York Times writes about the oral arguments in Bahlul v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:25 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The controlled substances involved included the Schedule II drug OxyContin, the Schedule III drug Vicodin, the Schedule IV drug Xanax, and the Schedule V drug cough syrup with codeine. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
A permanent Portuguese fort was established at Arguin in 1448, and the 1452 Dum Diversas papal bull of Pope Nicholas V specifically authorized Alfonso V of Portugal, …full and free permission to invade, search out, capture, and subjugate the Saracens and pagans and any other unbelievers and enemies of Christ wherever they may be… and to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm by Series of Essays
” Deceptive Deregulation November 2, 2020 | Cary Coglianese and Natasha Sarin, University of Pennsylvania Law School and Stuart Shapiro, Edward J. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 3:24 pm by Steve Davies
Edward Markey (D-Mass.) defended the practice of using citizen suits to hold the government accountable. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 5:51 pm by INFORRM
The Consultation Paper explains that this is intended to ensure that the provision catches publications to a limited number of people (e.g. a blog with a small number of subscribers). [read post]