Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 1501 - 1520 of 5,672
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2021, 8:13 am by Michael C. Dorf
It should be possible to cross-examine those people by pointing to inconsistencies. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 11:58 am by Victoria Clark
Harry Graver summarized the Supreme Court’s ruling in Ortiz v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 12:01 pm by CJLF Staff
  Denny Walsh of the Sacramento Bee reports on the high court's decision in People v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:10 am by Edith Roberts
Subscript Law has a graphic explainer for Monday’s decision in Herrera v. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 10:44 am by Christine Bechtold
The idea behind this amendment is that a defendant should have the opportunity to cross-examine and challenge the credibility of people making statements about him. [read post]
29 May 2015, 5:57 am
The 765 Anarchists are going to purge the vile pig scum from this land and restore constitutional rights to the people. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 2:11 am by Blog  Editorial
Judgment reserved. 16:06: Re the cross-appeal – the Judges in the Court below were correct to conclude that the cross-appeal had been properly dealt with by the letter the Government sent. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am by INFORRM
XJA v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2010] EWHC 3174 (QB) at [15]. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 12:12 pm
  Right up to the point he searched the car.At that point, he crossed the line. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:23 am by Walter Olson
[cross-posted from Point of Law] Tags: humor, Supreme Court, Twitter Related posts Microblog 2008-11-03 (3) Wyeth v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am by John Elwood
Since the Supreme Court’s last conference, we’ve crossed an important inflection point in American civic life. [read post]