Search for: "People v. Peters"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 1,929
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am
In contrast, the independent-counsel statute at issue in Morrison v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:11 am
Under section 6(e) of the FRCP, certain people involved in a grand jury proceeding “must not disclose a matter occurring before the grand jury,” including the grand jurors themselves, the government attorney presenting the case to the grand jury, the court reporter and other technical people involved in the proceeding itself. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 8:15 am
Manson, Graham v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 8:27 pm
The Su Âpreme Court's decision in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 3:38 am
The architecture is rich and varied, the people are warm and friendly. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 2:32 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 8:47 am
In Hickey v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:12 pm
Peter Schuck). [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
As the postal case was wending its way through the courts in 2020, four experts in the reliability of software-based systems—Peter Ladkin, Bev Littlewood, Harold Thimbleby and Martyn Thomas— wrote of the case, "[F]or any moderately complex software-based computer system, such as the IT transaction-processing system Horizon ... it is a practical impossibility to develop such a system so that the correctness of every software operation is provable to the relevant standard in… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
As the postal case was wending its way through the courts in 2020, four experts in the reliability of software-based systems—Peter Ladkin, Bev Littlewood, Harold Thimbleby and Martyn Thomas— wrote of the case, "[F]or any moderately complex software-based computer system, such as the IT transaction-processing system Horizon ... it is a practical impossibility to develop such a system so that the correctness of every software operation is provable to the relevant standard in… [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
Madden v Midland Funding, LLC, 786 F.3d 246 (2d Cir. 2015), cert. denied, 136, S. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:37 pm
W/r/t meaningful opposition—just a filing of an opposition shouldn’t immediately kick people back into the regular process. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 10:05 pm
People write comments on the blog, and they respond to them. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am
(There is also a requirement that the people concerned have to be personally connected, which is defined. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:23 pm
Taylor (K.B. 1769); Donaldson v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 12:56 pm
Very difficult claim to make because the information is public, or shared with a large number of people. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
Peter posts Is Viacom a little hypocritical? [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:23 pm
The authors criticise the recent ECJ judgment in Wood Floor Solutions Andreas Domberger GmbH v. [read post]
