Search for: "People v. Shorts"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 8,415
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2014, 7:37 pm
The ruling in Riley v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
(openDemocracy, Oct. 2023) [text]Colombia: IACHR Commends New Nationality Law (OAS, Nov. 2023) [text]Home at last: How Niger is working towards the eradication of the risk of statelessness (UNHCR, Nov. 2023) [text]‘I have no rights’: what happens to stateless people in Australia after the High Court’s ruling? [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 2:04 pm
In short, the court accepts Royal Smilde's argument that, in a case like this, it is up to the plaintiff to define what exactly the alleged copyright protected work consists of, which Levola was unable to do. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 11:42 am
Supreme Court today in decising Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:19 am
This Kat has been in transit, hence the fairly short Monday Miscellany. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm
In Encino Motorcars LLC v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 5:00 pm
The Court in Mester v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:54 am
Supreme Court’s 2014 ruling in Halliburton v. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 1:44 pm
Islam v Yap and Others. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 1:44 pm
Islam v Yap and Others. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:37 am
Case Information Canada v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:37 am
Case Information Canada v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:37 am
Case Information Canada v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:37 am
Case Information Canada v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:52 pm
Co. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
A short explanation of relists is available here. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:30 am
In short, there are few people with as central a role in the LGBT rights movement, past and present, as Matt Coles. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 2:55 pm
Efforts at reforming this broken system got a big boost in 2014, when the Supreme Court decided the Alice v. [read post]
EFF Asks Court to Uphold Federal Law That Protects Online Video Viewers’ Privacy and Free Expression
4 Jan 2024, 10:41 am
For example, the Supreme Court in Reno v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 2:16 pm
A regime that said (1) we can -- and affirmatively want to -- stop people from filing contradictory complaints in the first place, and a district court can permissibly do that, but (2) once a contradictory complaint is filed, we have to let it go forward; well, such a regime would make no sense. [read post]
