Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 1501 - 1520 of 178,347
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2024, 10:18 am by Howard Bashman
s $350,000 punitive damages cap to apply per plaintiff”: Mike Vilensky of Bloomberg Law has this report (subscription required for full access) on a ruling that the U.S. [read post]
The privilege dispute came to a head when plaintiff sought to compel LSU’s production of information from the 2013 Title IX investigation into sexual harassment allegations by LSU students against the then-head coach. [read post]
The privilege dispute came to a head when plaintiff sought to compel LSU’s production of information from the 2013 Title IX investigation into sexual harassment allegations by LSU students against the then-head coach. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 7:52 am by Eugene Volokh
We were unable to reach §230's scope, however, because the plaintiffs' claims would have failed on the merits regardless. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 7:01 am by Allan Blutstein
Va.) -- ruling that: (1) plaintiffs claims regarding agency’s lack of timeliness were moot, plaintiff had no right to declaratory relief or attorney’s fees on those claims, and plaintiff failed to properly allege a “policy-or-practice” claim; (2) multiple components performed adequate searches for requested records related to inquiry by U.S. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
SUPREME COURT CLASS ACTION DISPUTE ALLOWED TO CONTINUEAfter the Suffolk County Supreme Court denied Teachers Federal Credit Union’s motion to stay all proceedings and compel arbitration in an action which related to fees charged to checking accounts, an appeal ensued.And on its review, the Appellate Division, Second Department, noted that plaintiff A.D. couldn’t be compelled to arbitrate the dispute in the absence of a valid agreement. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Employer Introduces Vaccination Policy The case of Croke v VuPoint System Ltd. involved the plaintiff employee (the “employee”), who was employed by the defendant employer (“VuPoint”) as a technician. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Employer Introduces Vaccination Policy The case of Croke v VuPoint System Ltd. involved the plaintiff employee (the “employee”), who was employed by the defendant employer (“VuPoint”) as a technician. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
We therefore vacate the court’s denial of the State’s motion to dismiss Alexander’s as-applied challenge and remand for further proceedings. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Under the Final Rule, if a Covered Company were to settle a putative class action with private plaintiffs suing under a state UDAAP law (and no agency was involved), the Covered Company would not be required to register; however, if the Covered Company settled the same claim with a state attorney general, the Covered Company would be required to register. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
” He further noted that nearly all of the potential plaintiffs actually supported the plan, that similar non-debtor discharges had been used in other mass-tort cases, and that the Bankruptcy Code’s authorization of “appropriate” relief conferred broad discretion on bankruptcy judges. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
For that reason, this time of year is also when the media’s depiction/explanation of the Court’s rulings is at its most important. [read post]