Search for: "Powers v. Powers" Results 1501 - 1520 of 55,689
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2024, 10:30 pm by Jesse Peters
  The ICJ Order in South Africa v Israel On 26 January 2024, the ICJ delivered its landmark Order indicating provisional measures in South Africa v Israel. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  (I expect to assign the first article when I teach Johnson v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Whether you’re here in person or participating virtually from around the country, or even overseas, I thank you for joining us. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 7:34 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
" (Para 3)The Scheme contemplates the core infrastructure in hydrogen hubs, including Storage and transportation facilities for Green Hydrogen/its derivatives, Development/ upgradation of pipeline infrastructure, Green Hydrogen powered vehicle re-fuelling facility, Hydrogen compression and/or liquefaction technologies, as required, and so on (Para 2). [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
Although its proponents continue to tout originalism as a way to rein in judicial elites and ensure fidelity to the Constitution, it has unwittingly primed the federal judicial system for a future anti-democratic movement and consolidation of power. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by fjhinojosa
Casto’s article Robert Jackson’s Critique of Trump v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:04 am by Ben Jumonville and Mikha Romero
[1] National Small Business United, d/b/a the National Small Business Association v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 8:01 am by Laura
However, such orders are typically used in exceptional circumstances, and the court exercises its wide discretionary powers when making such decisions. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:43 am by Zaid Majiet
In Ditsoane v ACWA Power Africa Holdings (Pty) Limited 2023 JDR 4750 (CC), the applicant referred an unfair dismissal claim to the Labour Court. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 3:13 am by Dylan Gibbs
Opsis Airport Services; Quebec v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
” ENDNOTE [1] See Order, Lujan Claimants v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 11:09 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  Antonin Scalia had an acid tongue ("pure applesauce," "jiggery-pokery"), and he did his share of trolling as well (once responding to a law student's question about Bush v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 7:28 am by Unknown
According to the complaint, without the relief sought, the firm faces severe penalties and lacks the opportunity for pre-enforcement judicial review, leaving them with the dilemma of complying with an unconstitutional demand or risking their business's future (John Doe Corporation v. [read post]