Search for: "S. W. v. State"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 14,897
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2022, 6:00 am
An example of this use of the bad man thought experiment is provided in Justice Souter's opinion in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 5:51 pm
United States, 959 F.2d 1558, 1561 (11th Cir. 1992). [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 11:16 am
In a case last year before the Texas Supreme Court, BPX Operating Co. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 3:38 am
United StatesCox. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:44 pm
The Solicitor General’s Mixed Record of Success Before the Supreme Court in Copyright Cases Pam Samuelson Started w/significant contrast b/t SG’s brief in GvO and the outcome. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 10:43 am
[Then I reiterate my concerns about the regulatory state: how should we handle the gov’t’s interest? [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 10:07 am
The Federal Circuit recently addressed this issue in Thaler v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 2:50 pm
The August 10, 2022, Court of Appeals opinion in Register v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 11:18 am
Gore decision, some of George W. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:15 am
From Landino v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:42 am
” Dickerson v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:03 am
-W. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 8:25 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 11:35 am
Cir. 2001), in which the CAFC stated that “a bid award may be set aside if either: (1) the procurement official’s decision lacked a rational basis; or (2) the procurement procedure involved a violation of regulation or procedure” and “[w]hen a challenge is brought on the second ground, the disappointed bidder must show “a clear and prejudicial violation of applicable statutes or regulations. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 12:10 pm
The State of Illinois (1877) and Santa Clara County v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 12:10 pm
The State of Illinois (1877) and Santa Clara County v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 8:59 am
UN Human Rights CommitteeNjaru v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Community for Creative Non-Violence, 466 U.S. 288, 293 (1984) ("[w]e assume for present purposes, but do not decide," whether "overnight sleeping in connection with [a] demonstration is expressive conduct protected to some extent by the First Amendment"), but FAIR appears to have settled it. [2] United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 7:54 pm
Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
