Search for: "STATE V. MARTINEZ"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 1,662
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2009, 4:21 pm
Bataz Martinez, No. 04-15405, 2009 WL 707772 (11th Cir., Mar. 19, 2009), a drug prosecution, “because [the defendant] failed to demonstrate that he was less culpable than most of the other participants in the offense,” id. at *2. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:56 am
Thus, in the 1991 case of Rust v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:40 am
Martinez. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 6:01 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:53 am
Martinez v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:09 am
Florida and United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 10:03 am
Martinez Northern District of Ohio at Toledo 08a0736n.06 Russell v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Torres, No. 072331 Sentence of 188 to 235 months for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) the court did not abuse its discretion in counting both the state drug offense and the state gun offense as contributing to defendant's status as a career offender; 2) the district court was correct in finding the state gun conviction to be a "crime of violence" for career-offender purposes; and 3) district court was compelled to… [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 10:34 am
The trial court's decision dismissing Thompson's complaint for failure to state a claim is, therefore, affirmed.In Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 10:01 pm
Grassi, 783 F.2d 1572 (11th Cir. 1986) that a component of extortion for the purposes of the Hobbs Act is the victim’s fearful state of mind, and that “fear” is “‘a state of anxious concern, alarm or apprehension of harm and it includes fear of economic loss as well as fear of physical violence. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 11:21 am
-Marbury v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 6:38 am
Baird, 1972); so-called “hippies” (United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 4:05 am
This was foreshadowed by District of Colorado Judge William Martinez in Doe v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:21 pm
United States, 64 F.3d 206 (5th Cir. 1995); Barnes v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 12:14 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
Alexander, No. 071780 In a conviction for sale of controlled substance in or near school grounds, denial of writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over claims that the state courts unreasonably applied Batson v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 4:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
