Search for: "STRANGE v. STATE" Results 1501 - 1520 of 2,234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm by Matthew Finkin
An option would be to provide for greater state agency involvement with authority to review settlements. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:21 am by Eleonora Rosati
The claimant said that by stating in their trade mark application their bona fide intention to use the mark, they caused the public to believe they were associated with the claimant. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:33 pm
 The decision in question is Case C‑534/10 P Brookfield New Zealand Ltd, Elaris SNC v Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO), Schniga GmbH. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 12:00 am by Daniel Nazer
Adding to the strangeness of today’s ruling, the same three-judge panel simultaneously issued an excellent free speech decision in Brown v. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 8:13 am
 Miri, who like many readers is an IP enthusiast but not a patent specialist, reflects the concerns of many people who find themselves floating in that strange position of being somewhere between a layman and an expert. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 4:00 am by Bob Bauer
To the contrary, this is a clarifying moment, when we will see 43 years after United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
And if any margin is to be allowed, it seems to me strange to hold the “Mirror” liable in damages for a decision which three experienced judges in the Court of Appeal have held to be perfectly justified. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:05 am by Mairead Enright
Strangely enough, the Act itself partially provides for the equality of children in certain respects. [read post]