Search for: "Search/Seizure Warrant" Results 1501 - 1520 of 5,472
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2017, 2:55 pm by Chuck Peterson
On appeal, Almonte-Baez claimed that the warrantless search of an apartment violated his right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. [read post]
15 May 2017, 11:16 am by MBettman
T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325 (1985) (the Fourth Amendment ban on unreasonable searches and seizures applies to public school officials, but those officials may conduct warrantless searches of students so long as the searches are reasonable. [read post]
15 May 2017, 9:00 am by Jeffrey Rosen
  Richards places these secret searches in historical, technological, and constitutional context and argues that they are unprecedented, historically and technologically, and inconsistent with key constitutional values, including freedom of thought, freedom of expression, and freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
15 May 2017, 2:55 am by NCC Staff
The Fourth Amendment requires that the government act reasonably when it engages in a “search” or “seizure,” and the courts have held that, for many types of searches, this reasonableness requirement can only be met with a warrant. [read post]
14 May 2017, 9:40 pm by Roelke Law, P.A.
  The first is to pursue traditional defenses such as investigating search and seizure issues, warrant issues, actual versus constructive possession issues and other similar traditional defenses. [read post]
12 May 2017, 3:07 am by Neil Richards
Legally, too, the law was settled that the government needed to get a warrant before it tapped a phone, searched papers, or intercepted an email. [read post]
10 May 2017, 7:49 am by Lefteris K. Travayiakis, Esq.
In the execution of a search warrant by Boston Police of a multi-family home, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court upheld a superior court ruling that the seizure of a shotgun was improper. [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:26 am by Kate Howard
United States 16-402 Issue: Whether the warrantless seizure and search of historical cell-phone records revealing the location and movements of a cell-phone user over the course of 127 days is permitted by the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
9 May 2017, 11:11 am by kate
Levin, is one of hundreds of prosecutions resulting from the FBI’s 2015 seizure and operation of a child pornography site “Playpen. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:19 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-402 Issue: Whether the warrantless seizure and search of historical cell-phone records revealing the location and movements of a cell-phone user over the course of 127 days is permitted by the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
9 May 2017, 5:04 am by NCC Staff
But there are several reasons why the simple translation of the traditional rules governing searches and seizures to the world of digital evidence does not make good sense. [read post]
8 May 2017, 2:05 pm by Bob Farb
As a result of the seizure of this evidence, officers went to Jim’s Pawn Shop and obtained (1) a copy of the Beretta pistol purchase receipt that they had seized under the search warrant, and (2) the defendant’s ATF (federal Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms Bureau) application to purchase the Beretta weapon. [read post]
5 May 2017, 1:45 pm
’), seeking to suppress all evidence gathered from the seizure of his tablet and laptop computers, as well as all evidence from his Google e-mail account collected pursuant to the second warrant (Def. [read post]
5 May 2017, 7:43 am by Sarah Tate Chambers
After Eichenwald and his wife reported the tweet to law enforcement, the Dallas Police Department submitted a search warrant to Twitter. [read post]
3 May 2017, 1:05 pm
 Police subsequently seized a password-protected Apple iPhone 6 Plus as well.Agents from the Department of Homeland Security then applied for a federal search warrant to examine the seized devices. [read post]
2 May 2017, 11:42 am by Kym Stapleton
  However, the Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
2 May 2017, 8:10 am by MBettman
Votes to Accept the Case Yes: Chief Justice O’Connor and Justices French, Lanzinger, O’Donnell, and O’Neill No: Justices Pfeifer and Kennedy Key Precedent Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution (The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and… [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 5:12 pm by Kate Tummarello
” For nearly a decade, EFF has argued in court that these and other warrantless searches and seizures through Upstream are unconstitutional. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 7:29 am by NBlack
In this case, search warrants were issued allowing the police to review Rivello’s Twitter and iCloud accounts. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-402 Issue: Whether the warrantless seizure and search of historical cell phone records revealing the location and movements of a cell phone user over the course of 127 days is permitted by the Fourth Amendment. [read post]