Search for: "Self v State" Results 1501 - 1520 of 14,049
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2009, 1:21 am
US-FDIC-Seal.svg_.png In bank robbery trial, when copies of FDIC insurance certificates issued to victim bank were not self-authenticating under FRE 902(1) (because copies of the sealed documents were not the original sealed documents), the copies were admissible under FRE 1003 to prove the bank was federally insured when bank tellers testified that they recognized the copies of the certificates, the copies were dated before the robberies occurred, and the banks were… [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
United States could signal a retreat from the Court's willingness--in Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by admin
Commission on State Mandates (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 266, 272-274; County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 11:16 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
(B.), where the court stated, 50  The law on the question is clear. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 9:06 pm by Gabriel Scheffler
For many Americans, the answer to this question appears self-evident—the government is unpopular simply because it does a bad job. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 12:21 pm by Unknown
(Arm of the Tribe; Tribal Sovereign Immunity) State of Alaska v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 2:39 pm by Unknown
(Compact of Self Governance: Veteran Affairs Reimbursement) Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Both instruments are self-executing and will not require implementing legislation. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 8:04 am by Phil Dixon
Rule of completeness did not require or permit the admission of self-serving hearsay U.S. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 11:44 am by Danielle Citron
Thanks so much to Professor Neil Richards (who generously serves as our First Amendment guest expert) for his thoughts on Snyder v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 1:49 pm by Marty Lederman
As I mentioned on Friday, it’s likely that the consolidated follow-up cases to Hobby Lobby, involving nonprofit organizations’ RFRA challenges to the government’s religious accommodation, will henceforth collectively be known as Zubik v. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 11:02 am by James S. Friedman, LLC
 Because they are limited to taking self-protective measures during investigatory stops, there is no basis for them to enter the detainee’s home without a warrant. [read post]