Search for: "South Carolina v. United States" Results 1501 - 1520 of 1,557
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
"[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 12:10 pm
Sadly, of course, rampant racism and racial segregation continue in the United States, even though usually in more subtle ways than the in-your-face Jim Crow of the South. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 6:36 am
One of the South Carolina defendants, Admiral Lowell E. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 4:37 am
Montana, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Texas allow executions in such cases.The Louisiana Supreme Court upheld the sentence. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 9:14 pm
No one has been executed in the United States for a crime other than murder since 1964. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:01 pm
The following is a list of facilities for individuals with cerebral palsy in Mississippi compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive One-Stop Resource Guide to help locate assistance. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
South Carolina, 237 U.S. 180 (1915)..............................................................2-3 Morales v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 7:36 am
This guide has been compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a portion of their One-Stop Resource Guide. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
Lebowitz The author is a Queens County Supreme Court justice. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OCA Not Proper Party In Judges' Pay Suit September 14, 2007 To the Editor, In the Law Journal on Sept. 11, page 2 (see below), the attorney for the judges who are petitioners in Maron v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
Opening a new Term, the Supreme Court on Monday allowed the state of South Carolina to begin a lawsuit directly in the Court against its neighbor, North Carolina, in a dispute over alleged diversion of water from the Catawba River (138 Original). [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 12:22 pm
In particular, public wrath is displayed against those who would challenge "age of consent" laws, which are higher in the United States (now effectively 18 in all states due to Federal statutes) than in most other societies. [read post]