Search for: "State in Interest of AB" Results 1501 - 1520 of 1,810
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2011, 8:28 am by Mandelman
Which, as you’ve no doubt surmised through my self-congratulatory strutting about, is precisely what has happened in this particular case… right AB people… only they’re not even going to get rid of the hot towels, now are they? [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:04 pm by V.D.RAO
The relevant portion of the judgment of Hon’ble High Court of Bombay at Nagpur, in State Bank of India Vs. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
  Similar changes would be made to analogous statutes governing common interest developments and credit unions. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 3:32 pm
Given the district court's need to manage the cases before it and the "strong public interest in the finality of judgments in patent litigation," Cardinal Chem. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:16 am by Mirjam Frey
However, given a statutory basis, it could be a legitimate restriction as being within a public interest and proportional. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm by Jessie Canon
  The Supreme Court chose Abe Fortas, an experienced lawyer, to fill this role. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am by Marie Louise
(Spicy IP) Amendment to S.2(m) – Copyright Standing Commitee Report (Spicy IP) Enercon claims IPAB voided 12 patents on grounds of ‘national interest’; MIPR provides us with copy of the Order (Spicy IP) Israel Retrial granted in patent infringement case following defendant’s lawyer making anti-Semitic slurs (IP Factor) Italy Landmark decision in Italy on partial revocation for non-use of well known trademarks – DAMIANI (No 11637/2010) (Class 46) Milan court… [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This highly interesting decision deals with a situation where the Opposition Division (OD) introduced a new ground of opposition (A 100 (c)) of its own motion. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm by Adam Wagner
Some would say that it is too fundamental a right to ever be taken away by the state. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:55 pm by Maria Roche
” [62] The Court concluded: it cannot be right, because of the division of responsibility to regard the resulting state detention as consistent with Articl [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 1:55 pm by litigationtech
Here is an interesting quote from the Legislative Counsel’s Digest: “The bill would establish procedures for conducting expedited jury trials in civil cases where the parties sign a consent order to stipulate that those procedures apply, including provisions for a jury of 8 or fewer members, with no alternates, a limit of 3 peremptory challenges for each side, and a limit of 3 hours for each side to present its case. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:43 am by Eoin Daly
Yet the centrality of life as a legally-recognised interest throws up two interesting conundrums. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 10:04 am by Mandelman
The other bill was AB 764, and like SB 94, it was also the product of a legislative committee on banking and finance, so no surprises there. [read post]