Search for: "State v. House"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 28,787
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2023, 4:30 am
California: The California Supreme Court holds that an employer's business entity agents can be held liable for employment discrimination under the state Fair Employment and Housing Act. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:30 am
§ 414(v)(7)(B) . [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Supreme Court ruled on one aspect of video game ratings and sales in Brown v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 12:33 am
’[12] The Court of Appeal have stated that ‘where children are affected the state is subject to an obligation to relieve poverty if “necessary to allow family life to continue. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am
(Please note that these figures do not include state court securities class action lawsuit filings.) [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 3:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 11:11 am
The leading case on this subject in Pennsylvania is Hanrahan v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am
The United States represents every citizen, so “everybody” is literally true. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 3:51 am
See, e.g., Stencil v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 7:16 pm
Klor, When Deterrence Backfires: House Demolitions, Palestinian Radicalization, and Israeli Fatalities Ashlyn W. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 9:11 am
Coalition Against Domestic Violence, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 9:08 am
Coalition Against Domestic Violence, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 7:45 am
" Hicks v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
The Basic Conditions of Employment Act (BCEA) states that it is compulsory for an employer to provide unpaid maternity leave for a period of 4 months. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 1:32 am
If they proposed some Huawei v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 8:58 am
" In Powell v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
Brown v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 4:45 pm
Penal Code § 9.42; see, e.g., McFadden v. [read post]