Search for: "State v. I. A. A." Results 1501 - 1520 of 84,590
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2024, 8:07 am
I understand that different people -- and different cultures -- may have varying approaches to the issue.Nonetheless, personally, I wouldn't want to be the individual remembered by history as one who filed a federal lawsuit and fought hard in an attempt to make cockfighting legal in the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas Islands.Particularly since he loses. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am by Riccardo Calzavara, Arden Chambers
The Court of Appeal was bound by the decisions in Zalewska v Department for Social Development [2008] UKHL 67; [2008] 1 WLR 2602 and Kaczmarek v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] EWCA Civ 1310; [2009] PTSR 897. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 7:30 am by Lisa Grumet
I call this phenomenon “hidden nondefense,” and I discuss it in more detail in my recent Fordham Law Review article. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Last December, I reported on the Supreme Court of Kentucky's decision in Schnuerle v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:19 am
 An appeal which it loses.Still, I guess you have to admire the confidence of a client in his lawyer. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 6:50 am by Eric Goldman
: Private Publishers Aren’t State Actors–Manhattan Community Access v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 7:07 am by Bob Lawless
As I replied to Eric, a bankruptcy judge might complain Stern v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:55 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) I was at the Supreme Court this morning for the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 4:26 pm
That quote has long been on my list of best quotes about federalism in the history of the Supreme Court, so I was pleased to see it quoted in a Supreme Court case that came out today, Bond v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:41 pm by Betsy McKenzie
Times' version of what I read in the Boston Globe, I stumbled over an earlier article in the Times, on March 2, 2010, "States' Rights vs. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 1:44 pm by Gene Quinn
Over the last several days I have heard of an alarming trend from the United States Patent and Trademark Office — Patent Examiners are canceling Notices of Allowance and yanking previously granted claims back into prosecution while citing the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Alice v. [read post]