Search for: "State v. Irons"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 2,833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm
In many areas, particularly in the north, social housing providers state that they have very few one bed properties, so those looking to downsize will either be frustrated, or forced into the private sector, ironically increasing the housing benefit bill. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 12:02 pm
We’ve blogged about the Gawker intern litigation (Mark v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 4:05 am
See United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 3:00 am
SE v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 4:57 am
Tisdale v. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am
Miller, Penn State University: Rhetoric and Judicial Activism: The Case of Hillary Goodridge v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
Santa Rosa Memorial Hosp.Docket: 10-283Issue(s): (1) Whether Medicaid recipients and providers may maintain a cause of action under the Supremacy Clause to enforce § 1396a(a)(30)(A) by asserting that the provision preempts a state law reducing reimbursement rates; and (2) whether a state law reducing Medicaid reimbursement to providers may be held preempted by § 1396a(a)(30)(A) based on requirements that do not appear in the text of the statute.Certiorari-Stage… [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 3:25 pm
City of Santee (4th Dist. 2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 260), sometimes in ironic fashion. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 7:49 am
In fact, in Abramski v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
In Russell v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
In Russell v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this series, I explained why last week’s opinions in Chiafalo v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:21 pm
By Eric Goldman Network Automation, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 8:22 pm
Griffiths v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 1:28 pm
General Iron & Welding Co. in 1976. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 8:25 am
” U.S. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:16 am
In Judulang v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 3:18 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 3:54 pm
Ironically, even 99 Cents Only Stores vs. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 12:48 pm
There seemed to be two major threads of argument in Nebraska v. [read post]
