Search for: "State v. K. A. M." Results 1501 - 1520 of 2,113
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2011, 7:32 am by Dan Markel
Farber (Northeastern University) Privacy in the Workplace: City of Ontario v Quon *Clifford S Fishman (Catholic University of America) Consent-To-Search and Dignity *Josephine Ross (Howard University) Abstract: This country is at a crossroads regarding privacy. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:28 pm
My California-Davis colleague Andrea K. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:25 pm by David O'Brien
  Looking back at our e-mail thread, I’m counting at least 20 stories that circulated over the last several days. [read post]
5 May 2011, 6:59 pm by Michael J.Z. Mannheimer
Sessions III issued a decision yesterday in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The Status of Religious Arbitration in the United States and Canada Nicholas Walter Abstract: This paper discusses, and challenges, the status of religious arbitration in the United States and Canada. [read post]
1 May 2011, 7:09 pm by cdw
Horn and Mumia Abu-Jamal, a/k/a Wesley Cook v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 5:26 am by Susan Brenner
The judge noted that “[k]ey in determining whether § 230 immunity applies is the extent of the interactive computer service provider's participation in the content at issue. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 7:42 pm by Adam Levitin
The HuffPo has a major piece on the debit card swipe fee legislative fight, which seems to be a stand-alone K-Street Full Employment Act. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
  If only some, then there’s the additional question of how much effort the legal system should expend, or force the parties to expend, in sorting one from the other.We thought we’d explore that question today, and we start by comparing arguably the most pro-plaintiff state in the country – Idaho – on comment k issues with the most pro-defense state – California. [read post]