Search for: "State v. London"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2008, 5:21 pm
Life Receivables Trust v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:36 pm
What she cannot do, however, is use the power of the State to punish or suppress disfavored expression. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 1:57 pm
German princes wrote to King George V, offering to substitute themselves for the kaiser. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014] EWHC 3354… [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 1:56 am
As mentioned above, on Thursday 20 June 2024 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) handed down a unanimous judgment in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Styen J handed down judgement in the case of Prospect v Evans [2024] EWHC 1533 (KB). [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
United States The Cyberlaw Clinic reports that it has filed an amicus curiae brief (.pdf) in the United States Supreme Court in Oracle v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:21 am
Liberty along with Haw have tried to challenge those powers under human rights law, but, after victory in the High Court, ultimately failed to convince the Court of Appeal (see Haw, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2006] EWCA Civ 532 (08 May 2006).) [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 8:57 am
Judge Koh, who was made globally famous when she presided in the Apple v Samsung dispute, stated that to do so would essentially be going overboard. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
” Under Part V, “Protection from suffering detriment in employment,” of this law, 47B on “Protected disclosures” states that, “A worker has the right not to be subjected to any detriment by any act, or any deliberate failure to act, by his employer done on the ground that the worker has made a protected disclosure. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
” Under Part V, “Protection from suffering detriment in employment,” of this law, 47B on “Protected disclosures” states that, “A worker has the right not to be subjected to any detriment by any act, or any deliberate failure to act, by his employer done on the ground that the worker has made a protected disclosure. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:01 pm
UK decision actually states in full [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 1:09 pm
Continuing the theme of balancing copyright and other fundamental rights, from this Kat’s previous book review, she now turns to Emily Hudson’s Drafting Copyright Exceptions: From the Law in Books to the Law in Action, which was also nominated in the IPKat book of year awards for best copyright book.Law in books v law in action Hudson, Reader at King’s College London, introduces her book by stating that we need a new paradigm through which to view… [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 11:03 am
| Good news and bad news for bio-pharmaceutical patenting in the United States | HP? [read post]
4 May 2022, 10:01 pm
An Optis v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:12 am
The Guardian published results of a study of Twitter usage during the London riots recently. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 9:30 pm
Around the Colloquia: Malick Ghachem, Maine Law, presented "The Legal History of Prisoner Voting: A View from the Northeastern United States” to his faculty’s workshop. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 1:23 am
First State Ins. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
”, London School of Economics. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:23 am
City of New London on the ground that political action in 42 states allegedly weakened the power to take property for economic development. [read post]
