Search for: "State v. Lord" Results 1501 - 1520 of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2019, 9:06 am by Matthew Davie
R (on the application of Edward Bridges) v The Chief Constable of South Wales [2019] EWHC 2341 (Admin) Case Note Introduction In Bridges, an application for judicial review, the UK High Court (Lord Justice Haddon-Cave and Mr. [read post]
4 May 2009, 5:11 pm
., with introductory note by Bruce Zagaris House of Lords: EM (Lebanon) v. [read post]
31 May 2009, 10:24 am
On apparent bias, the Court noted that the website for HRL stated: We have dealt with over 3,500 reviews with unparallel [sic] success. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Isabel McArdle
v)              Is the Secretary of State entitled to rely on the defence of act of state? [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
As noted in Arnold, compensation for mental distress arising from breach of this type of contract is “consistent with a long line of cases, beginning with the famous judgment of Lord Denning in Jarvis v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The facts of Richard v BBC [2018] EWHC 1837 (Ch) help demonstrate this. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 2:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
Early in the eighteenth century, Lord Chief Justice Holt stated that hatred and malice are "distinct passions of the mind. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 3:46 am
Four years later, however, the Lords revisited the principles established by Fairchild in the case of Barker v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 7:53 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Public Law Project) v The Lord Chancellor, heard 18 April 2016. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:00 am by Rose Falconer
  Recent decisions, such as the order made by the federal court in Indiana last Thursday in Baskin v Bogan to the effect that the state was to recognise immediately out-of-state same-sex marriage, are joining a raft of US decisions that are pushing the issue closer to the steps of the US Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:36 pm
However, the Apple v Samsung cases pending before several national courts in Europe expose the inherent limitations of such provisions. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
  This was confirmed by the House of Lords in Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
She was given permanent accommodation before the Supreme Court hearing, but Lord Hope stated that, if there had been a live issue it would “have been preferable for her to be given an opportunity for the proportionality of the order to be considered in the light of her personal circumstances”. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:48 pm by NL
She was given permanent accommodation before the Supreme Court hearing, but Lord Hope stated that, if there had been a live issue it would “have been preferable for her to be given an opportunity for the proportionality of the order to be considered in the light of her personal circumstances”. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Public Law Project) v The Lord Chancellor, heard 18 April 2016. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 12:27 pm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------LORD JUSTICE KEENEMRS JUSTICE DOBBS DBEMR JUSTICE WALKER R -v- JACK TURNER DANIEL-LANCE SAUMUELS Crown copyright ©1. [read post]