Search for: "State v. Manning"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 13,566
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2014, 4:49 pm
Section 9-11-107 and 9-11-109, which states “marriage shall only ben between a man and a woman. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 12:37 am
State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 11:20 am
Facts reported in the Ohio Supreme Court's 1998 ruling in State v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:16 pm
In United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 9:56 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 12:22 pm
Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
In those other cases—chiefly Loving v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 11:45 am
In State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 1:15 pm
He stated that if his request were denied, he would seek to waive counsel and represent himself. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 10:10 pm
That in itself is a heinous crime BY the State to deny a minor the legal protections and immunities to which one is, and has always been, entitled. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 8:41 am
“A man must work in order to live. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:45 pm
Passed by the state's voters in 2008, Proposition 8 amended the California Constitution to provide that only marriage between a man and a woman is "valid or recognized. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 10:18 pm
The opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 5:39 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 6:37 am
State of Indiana - see ILB entry here, 3rd case. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 12:26 pm
The Denver Post stated that A federal judge in Denver has ruled that the Stolen Valor Act is “facially unconstitutional” because it violates free speech, and he dismissed the criminal case against Rick Strandlof, a man who lied about being an Iraq war veteran. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:31 am
http://www.salon.com/2014/08/29/st_paul_cops_tase_and_arrest_black_man_for_waiting_to_pick_his_kids_up_from_preschool/ http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/08/27/sitting-while-black-in-minnesota-cops-tase-man-for-not-stating-his-name/ https://www.youtube.com/watch? [read post]
18 May 2008, 8:26 am
The Supreme Court reversal May 13th in the case of Andrew Lee Watts v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 6:49 pm
The Second Circuit ruled today in Edwardo v. [read post]
