Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 21,678
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2023, 1:38 pm
See Rogers v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:38 pm
See Rogers v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 10:50 am
For centuries, European states have required testing in proof houses, which stamp barrels that pass the test with proof marks. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 2:47 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
Intellectual Property The General Court declined to register the word mark “F–KING AWESOME” on the basis that it was not sufficiently distinctive to be registered as a trademark in the EU. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 8:53 am
The Appellant denied this and stated his name had been used for the transaction by someone else. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 8:00 am
” In concluding that Section 533 precludes coverage for the malicious prosecution claim against the law firm, the appellate court relied heavily on Downey Venture v. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 10:44 am
IndiaRam v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Policy v New York City Off. of Payroll Admin., 187 AD3d 435, 435 [1st Dept 2020] [internal quotation marks omitted], lv denied 36 NY3d 906 [2021]; see also Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 87 AD3d 874, 875 [1st Dept 2011], affd 20 NY3d 1028 [2013]). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Policy v New York City Off. of Payroll Admin., 187 AD3d 435, 435 [1st Dept 2020] [internal quotation marks omitted], lv denied 36 NY3d 906 [2021]; see also Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 87 AD3d 874, 875 [1st Dept 2011], affd 20 NY3d 1028 [2013]). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm
Robert Loeb provided a synopsis of Bahlul v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
Last week marked the 60th anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
In West Virginia v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 2:45 pm
In Abitron Austria GmbH, et al., v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 2:45 pm
In Abitron Austria GmbH, et al., v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 1:27 pm
Matthew Guarnieri, assistant to the solicitor general, argues for the United States. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 12:55 pm
” However, in series of cases following the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Marchand v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:31 am
Mark Warner (D-Va.) and Sen. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
With this Kat’s feed being flooded with the news of the ruling in “Pecorino Romano” v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:05 pm
In 2016, Swarns served as lead counsel for Buck, arguing Buck v. [read post]
