Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 61,174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2024, 5:13 am
See Rosenman Colin Freund Lewis & Cohen v Neuman, 93 AD2d 745, 746 [1st Dept 1983] (account stated established by receiving and retaining bills without any timely objection); Liddle O’Connor, Finkelstein & Robinson v Koppelman, 215 AD2d 204 [1st Dept 1995] (account stated based only on partial payment); Bracken & Margolin, LLP v Schambra, 270 AD2d 221 [2d Dept 2000] (account stated based on retention of invoices without… [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 3:19 pm
Governor of the State of Florida. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 4:13 pm
Predicting the Fallout from King v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 11:33 pm
Google means that court’s decision will stand for now. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 12:54 am
The Supreme Court in Lawrence v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 1:40 pm
An ACS v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
” Seasoned attorneys—or those who were practicing law before the United States Supreme Court’s 1977 decision in Bates v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 4:25 am
In some states, such a finding will bar a claim completely. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:00 pm
Schill v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court refused to defend Roe v. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:01 pm
”In addition, Thomas argued that allowing federal courts to overturn a state prisoner’s conviction and sentence was an “intru[sion] on state sovereignty … [that] overrides the State’s sovereign power to enforce societal norms through criminal law. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 12:04 pm
That means the landowner in this case could receive his administrative review. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 5:45 am
We are reminded in Claybar v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 9:38 am
State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 5:21 am
State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 12:43 pm
See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 24–27. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am
The Tenth Circuit ruled in favor of the state, but the U.S. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 5:10 am
State v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 10:37 am
As Nearly Legal states, the Court of Appeal said that, in certain circumstances, it might well mean just that, and that the Local Authority should intervene in the Children Act proceedings if it wished to argue the point. [read post]
