Search for: "State v. Oxford"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 1,744
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2016, 8:49 am
It stated clearly in 1994 in Campbell v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court explained in the 1990 case of Rutan v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
(IP Spotlight) (Excess copyright) (Patent Docs) (Spicy IP) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Intellectual Property Watch) CAFC greatly limits software and business method patents: In re Bilksi (IP Law Observer) (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) (IP Spotlight) (The Prior Art) (Patent Baristas) (EFF) (Patent Prospector) (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property) (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IP Updates) (Daily Dose of IP) (PLI) (Green Patent… [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 6:51 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 6:51 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:00 am
nolanguage=en+-+t-623373. [9] 56th Miller Lecture: Internet Revolutionized Creativity, Changing IP Law, Georgia State University (Sep. 17, 2015), http://law.gsu.edu/2015/09/17/56th-miller-lecture/. [10] Williams v. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 pm
Most notably, in Hoyt v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
Since both the United States and India are federations, invariably the Superior Courts in those jurisdictions are called on to decide when there appears to be any conflict between state and federal legislation or a question of legislative competence arises. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
Or consider another example: in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm
Those of us who work with or write for JIPLP say a big thank you to our readers and also to publishers Oxford University Press for being so willing to trust us! [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:59 am
” • • • Redefining Free Culture was originally posted on Copyhype • • • FootnotesSee, for example, The Ethics of Consent, pp. 45-51 (Oxford University Press 2010), citing Thomas Hobbes, Adam Smith, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill.See, for example, Lynch v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 10:50 pm
Judge Gorsuch also wrote the Tenth Circuit opinion in another notable monopolization case called Novell Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2017, 10:50 pm
Judge Gorsuch also wrote the Tenth Circuit opinion in another notable monopolization case called Novell Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
Lord Macdonald of River Glaven (Warden, Wadham College, Oxford University; formerly Director of Public Prosecution, England and Wales), Dr. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:31 am
It was also discussed in the judgments C-507/17, Google v CNIL; and Case C-136/17 that a data subject should have a “right to be forgotten” where the retention of such data infringes the Directive 95/46 and the GDPR. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
., Perpetual War and International Law: Legacies of the War on Terror (Oxford University Press forthcoming 2024) and draws upon Oona A. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:29 am
Supreme Court Decision, Lingle v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 11:22 am
State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
The ruling in Hamdan v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 9:01 pm
In an early case, Willingham v. [read post]
