Search for: "State v. Plant" Results 1501 - 1520 of 4,019
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2008, 7:07 am
  Although some inmates have claimed that the procedure in their states differs in some ways from the Kentucky procedure upheld by the Court in Baze v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:07 pm by Dianne Saxe
  Specifically, the Court stated the displacement test as simply “whether the statute speaks directly to the question at issue,” and that in this case, Massachusetts v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:22 pm by WIMS
      "Second, in determining that spent fuel can safely be stored on site at nuclear plants for sixty years after the expiration of a plant's license, the Commission failed to properly examine future dangers and key consequences. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:33 pm by WIMS
      "Second, in determining that spent fuel can safely be stored on site at nuclear plants for sixty years after the expiration of a plant's license, the Commission failed to properly examine future dangers and key consequences. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 6:36 pm by Keith Rizzardi
AWR seeks to enjoin a timber salvage sale proposed by the United States Forest Service. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 3:55 pm by Amy Howe
Immigration policy and state intervention In Arizona v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:49 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Asarco LLC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 9:06 pm
The Court will hear argument tomorrow in No. 05-3152, United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Writing for the New York Times, journalist Coral Davenport examined how states are preparing to comply with the Clean Power Plan—the Obama Administration rule that aims to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants under the Clean Air Act—despite the fact that the plan has been stayed by the U.S. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:34 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
A "rule of reason" (Matter of Jackson v New York State Urban Development Corp., 67 NY2d at 417) is applicable not only to an agency's judgments about the environmental concerns it investigates, but to its decisions about which matters require investigation. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:34 pm by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
A "rule of reason" (Matter of Jackson v New York State Urban Development Corp., 67 NY2d at 417) is applicable not only to an agency's judgments about the environmental concerns it investigates, but to its decisions about which matters require investigation. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 4:08 am by SHG
The rule orders states to make big cuts in carbon dioxide emissions from power plants over the next 15 years, setting individual goals for each state while giving them considerable flexibility in how to get reach them. [read post]