Search for: "State v. Self" Results 1501 - 1520 of 14,018
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2011, 8:30 pm by Lawrence Solum
First, the Supreme Court’s categorical unwillingness to consider state-law reversals is nothing more than a self-imposed constraint from its 1874 decision in Murdock v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 11:16 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
(B.), where the court stated, 50  The law on the question is clear. [read post]
3 May 2018, 5:06 am by Gail Heriot
But now the issue is in state court and state laws will be at issue. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 8:43 am by Eugene Volokh
The Illinlois Supreme Court had already held that the Second Amendment protects a right to carry guns in most public places, and in today's People v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 1:21 am
US-FDIC-Seal.svg_.png In bank robbery trial, when copies of FDIC insurance certificates issued to victim bank were not self-authenticating under FRE 902(1) (because copies of the sealed documents were not the original sealed documents), the copies were admissible under FRE 1003 to prove the bank was federally insured when bank tellers testified that they recognized the copies of the certificates, the copies were dated before the robberies occurred, and the banks were… [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 1:49 pm by Marty Lederman
As I mentioned on Friday, it’s likely that the consolidated follow-up cases to Hobby Lobby, involving nonprofit organizations’ RFRA challenges to the government’s religious accommodation, will henceforth collectively be known as Zubik v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by admin
Commission on State Mandates (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 266, 272-274; County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 9:06 pm by Gabriel Scheffler
For many Americans, the answer to this question appears self-evident—the government is unpopular simply because it does a bad job. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 11:44 am by Danielle Citron
Thanks so much to Professor Neil Richards (who generously serves as our First Amendment guest expert) for his thoughts on Snyder v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 1:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
From a supplement to a self-represented appellant's brief in Shaver v. [read post]