Search for: "State v. Stephens." Results 1501 - 1520 of 7,106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry and United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2014, 3:23 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It was held in People v Moore, People v Doyle, People v Colon and People v LoVerde that the testimony of the victim must be corroborated if the offense charged is intrinsically related to or committed in aid of affecting the sex crime. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:15 pm by Patricia Salkin
California Outdoor Equity Partners, LLC v City of Los Angeles, 2015 WL 7259731 (CD CA. 11/16/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Equal Protection, Signs [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 9:36 am by Joe Rosenbaum
In a unanimous decision written by Justice Stephen G. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 9:36 am by Joe Rosenbaum
In a unanimous decision written by Justice Stephen G. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 6:27 am by Ted Frank
The last few days have seen some fascinating discussion worth reading about the relationship between tort reform and federalism: William Jacobson, Stephen Bainbridge (citing a 2004 Volokh analysis), Ilya Somin @ Volokh. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 6:16 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Following the Supreme Court decision to overturn the landmark Roe v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 7:35 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
  On Tuesday, Nov. 28th  the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:45 pm by Emily
On Monday, December 6, the Ninth Circuit will hear oral arguments in Perry v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 11:56 am
STATE OF FLORIDAAppellant(s) Appellee(s)Appellant's Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction to the Trial Court in Light of Baze v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:15 pm by David Gans
First, the majority held that the “undue burden” standard announced in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 12:02 am
Menaker, The Consequences of Corruption in Investor-State Arbitration Alain Pellet, Police Powers or the State’s Right to Regulate Mark Feldman, Denial of Benefits after Plama v. [read post]