Search for: "State v. Sullivan"
Results 1501 - 1520
of 2,731
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2012, 5:35 am
Sullivan etc.: “the adults in the room know that if you say negative things about public officials you’re going to get sued. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:29 am
If she approved, then an account was stated and there is little to no defense to the attorney fee issue. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 3:32 pm
The plaintiffs in the case are Louis V. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 10:10 am
You don't have to articulate an administerable standard any more than you did in Bush v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:50 am
State Automobile Mut. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 10:00 am
See, e.g., Sullivan v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:02 pm
Plaintiff’s expert stated that cobalt chromium “appears to be a valid substitution. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 8:17 am
Titled, “What your payment method reveals about you,” the author of the post, Erin Sullivan, listed a series of unlikely payment actions and a line on the presumed personal characteristics of the payer. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:01 am
In 2011 and again this week, I constructed the April Fools' edition around a reworking of lyrics from Gilbert & Sullivan. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:01 am
Sullivan at the Drug and Device Law Blog: "Any Exposure ? [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:01 am
In 2011 and again this week, I constructed the April Fools' edition around a reworking of lyrics from Gilbert & Sullivan. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 6:37 pm
Sutton’s opinion, meanwhile, rested on a dubious distinction between as-applied and facial challenges that would have required the Supreme Court to overrule United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 10:40 am
Danny Sullivan's writeup of the issue from last Fall. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 6:12 am
Sullivan; the NYT depends on ownership of copyright to protect freedom of expression. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 12:50 pm
Carly Sullivan, a spokeswoman for U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:15 am
The plaintiff demonstrated his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the first cause of action by tendering invoices for services rendered prior to December 5, 2006, setting forth his hourly rate, the billable hours expended, and the particular services rendered, and establishing that the defendant signed such invoices, failed to timely object to the invoices, and made partial payments thereon (see Landa v Dratch, 45 AD3d 646, 648; Landa v Sullivan, 255… [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 4:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 12:18 pm
Sullivan, supra at 266, 269, quoting Associated Press v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 7:00 am
As I wrote last month in my post about the GPC v. [read post]
